Fiction is trickier. I have three categories: my guilty secrets, my basic reads, and my serious investments.
My “guilty secrets” are generally science fiction and fantasy books paperbacks. Think the Harry Potter series, for example. They’re fun to read and are pure escapism. I don’t read this category of books too often but when I do I tend to go on a little binge.
My “basic reads” tend to be best selling books by well-known authors. For example, I recently read Margaret Atwood’s The Year of the Flood. I was less than impressed with this book, which I found to have certain imaginative elements but poorly executed. Basic reads can be enjoyable but they also tend to be forgettable.
My “serious investments” are books that inspire thought and contemplation and which I may read more than once. My most favourite books tend to fall in this category, which are few and far between. Unfortunately, what I hope is a “serious investment” often turns out to be a “basic read”.
My most recent book is Anna Karenin, by Leo Tolstoy. I’ve only read one hundred pages but I’m enjoying it immensely; it somehow manages to be both funny and sad at the same time, although I can sense a looming catastrophe on the horizon. In any event, it’s brilliantly written. Take this passage for example:
The two friends were silent all the way to the restaurant. Levin was wondering what the change in Kitty’s expression had meant, alternately assuring himself that there was hope for him, and falling into despair, clearly seeing that it was madness to hope; but yet feeling himself another man since her smile and the words Au revoir.Or this:
Five minutes later Kitty’s friend the Countess Nordston, married the previous winter was announced. She was a thin, highly-strung ailing woman with brilliant black eyes and a sallow complexion. She was fond of Kitty and her affection, like that of every married woman for a young girl, expressed itself in a desire to see Kitty married in accordance with her own ideal of happiness;It definitely has the hallmarks of a “serious investment”.
Ah literature. I love the Russians, Turgenev, Gogol, Dostoyevsky, Bulgakov, Chekhov... they share a seriousness about life combined with a black humour that I love. Anna Karenina is not one of my favourites. For me it was a worthwhile investment, rather than a brilliant and absorbing read. I'll be really interested to hear your final conclusions. I'm a literature snob, even my light reads I prefer to be well-written and inciteful. My guilty secret is tv!
ReplyDeleteshaking head over here. you're too obsessed with the bourgeois canon of male literature, man. i think that's why you think Year of the Flood was poorly executed. we should argue sometime soon. :)
ReplyDeleteI liked Handmaid's Tale but her latest stuff seem poorly written(at least to me). But I do admit that I have a soft spot for epics (Les Miserables, War and Peace, Anna Karenin so far...). On the other hand I am not a fan of the limited number of Dickens' books that I've read. I'm no English Major so you'll have to tell me what that means sometime!
ReplyDeleteDuring my sahm days I was really into early to mid century domestic books - like the Persephone catalogue. I still love those books - about nothing but real life - but I'm always up for sci fi too. Have you read Anathem? Highly recommended! And I bet you'd like wolf hall, although I picked it for book club and everyone else hated it.
ReplyDeleteAnna Karenin is one of Erin's favourite books. It's on my list too. But speaking of books I am waiting for a new non-fiction title good sir.
ReplyDeleteErin wants to know how you're dealing with all the characters... "sooo many"
ReplyDelete